OUTWOOD IN SURREY "The Village with the Mill"
|
C/O 2 Dirty Lane, Ashurst Wood, West Sussex RH19 3RY
Tel: 07592 151985 ~ Email: parish.clerk@outwood.org
MINUTES OF THE MEETIG OF OUTWOOD PARISH COUNCIL HELD ON 5TH JUNE 2024 THE CHURCH ROOM, WASP GREEN LANE, OUTWOOD AT 7.30PM
PRESENT: Cllrs. Devlin (Chair), Baldock, Howard and Malley
APOLOGIES: Cllr. de Wiggondene-Sheppard
IN ATTENDANCE: County Cllr. C Farr, District Cllr. S Farr, District Cllr. A Bolton, the Clerk
ALSO PRESENT: One member of the public
06/00760 MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the following meetings had been circulated in advance and were proposed for approval by Cllr. Malley. This was seconded by Cllr. Howard and the minutes were signed as a true record.
SO RESOLVED
06/00761 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST – None
06/00762 COUNTY COUNCILLOR’S REPORT – Nothing to report
06/007663 DISTRICT COUNCILLORS' REPORTS
It was reported that the Head of Planning (Helen Murch) had resigned with immediate effect.
06/00764 PLANNING APPLICATIONS
Proposal: Part change of use of land and buildings from Class E, B2 andB8 use and sawmill use, to use of land and buildings for Class e, B2 and B8, sawmill and car repair, restoration, and sales area. Removal of hardstanding (1062sqm) construction of car park and erection of fencing (retrospective)
Location: Sawmills, Green Lane Outwood RH1 5QP
Comments: Outwood Parish Council does not support the granting of retrospective planning permission for the change of use at the site, to include car repairs, restoration and sales. The development of the land associated with the change of use commenced in May 2023, so we note that it has taken the applicant a year to seek retrospective permission. Given that the work undertaken includes building outside of the area certified as lawful in the 2020 CLEUD, and on green belt land (as identified in the planning statement prepared by Work By Here on behalf of the applicant) the applicant should have been aware that this would require permission. Had permission been sought at the time we would have objected to it. We do not support the use of green belt land for the purpose of operating a vehicle business, nor do we support the enclosure of previously open green belt land with fences. We are also very concerned about the potential environmental damage that may have been caused by the development of the site ; we note that expert agencies have now advised that no development should have taken place without proper assessment.
We support a return of the greenbelt land to its previous state, and removal of the development that has happened without approval. If there is to be any change of use for the site in areas that are not green belt then adequate provision needs to be made to ensure there is no noise disturbance for neighbours; no risk of trade effluent (car oil/fuel etc) entering the watercourse; and minimal traffic movements. A 50 car, car park is clearly excessive for a business that according to the planning application will have zero additional staff. If this is intended as hard-standing for cars for sale, or for customers, this is an inappropriate scale and will lead to an increase in vehicle movements in the area
06/00765 AVIATION AND TRANSPORT – Nothing to report. It was AGREED that this item only appear on the agenda when there is something to report.
06/00766 COMMUNITY MATTERS
AGREED
06/00767 FINANCE
05/00768 AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING – None
The meeting closed at 8.16pm
Signed: …………………………………………………….. Date:………………………………………………….
CHAIR